|
MAY / JUNE 2007 HARVARD MACY New program addresses role of assessment in creating a culture of continuous improvement The Harvard Macy Institute welcomed 50 participants from 25 institutions to Boston in March for the first offering of a course on assessment in education. The objective of the five-day Program for Comprehensive Assessment in Health Science Education was to prepare participants to design and implement strategies aimed at helping to transform their medical institutions into true learning communities guided by the pursuit of continuous improvement.
The course was co-directed by Elizabeth Armstrong, PhD, Director of the Institute; Connie Bowe, MD, Senior Consultant at HMI; and N. Lynn Eckhert, MD, MPH, DrPH, Director of Academic Programs at HMI. The participants, who hailed from institutions in the U.S. and abroad, included academic faculty, health care educators, and administrators with responsibility for assessment of students and residents, faculty, and educational programs. Nine institutions sent teams in the hopes that the participants could apply what they learned to post-program collaborations aimed at improving assessment. The program was designed to address assessment in four major areas: learning, teaching, curricula and professional training programs, and institutional performance. Readings and presentations drew from the fields of business, engineering, and anthropology, among others. Each participant was part of a project team charged with designing a system of assessment aligned with their institutional objectives. Eager at first to collect new tools for assessment, the participants engaged with the faculty’s suggestion that they start from an examination of their institution’s culture in order to identify the tools and strategies appropriate for them.
“Many of the course participants are under tremendous pressure to collect quantitative data to meet the requirements of outside accrediting and oversight bodies,” explained Bowe. “The program illustrated how a thoughtful systems approach allows organizations to streamline the amount of information gathered while linking it in creative ways that are useful in revealing patterns and relationships to inform decisions and more effectively promote their institutional goals.” Armstrong added that adopting the right approach—aligned with the institutional mission, properly resourced, and accepted by all the key stakeholders—is critical to bringing an improvement-focused systems perspective to education. “Institutions that foster a learning community use assessment to reveal strengths and weaknesses in how the educational mission is carried out, and to trigger a system or process that is in place to address those issues as they arise,” said Armstrong. One of the participants was M. Philip Luber, MD, who is the Director of Education in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. Luber said that the course challenged him to “consider the real-world obstacles to implementing sophisticated assessment tools, such as the different ‘cultures’ of academic medicine”—one example being the medical culture of avoiding critical feedback. He added that over the course of the program he became “painfully aware of the snail-like movement of crucial assessment data in [his] program” and resolved to “make detailed, user-friendly, day-to-day formative evaluation the norm rather than the exception.”
Copyright 2007 Harvard Medical International |
|